Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 24
Filtrar
3.
Acta Dermatovenerol Croat ; 30(1): 57-58, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-2046604

RESUMEN

Proper hand hygiene is one of the top preventive measures against the Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). In this study, we report the cases of four patients who presented with blonde discoloration of hair of the dorsal hands and distal forearms during the COVID-19 pandemic. The mean age of participants was 41.25±4.35 years, and 75% percent of them were men. Three patients were medical staff who had to use antiseptics frequently, and one of them was a housewife. In all participants, the primary color of hand hair was black. The duration of sanitizer use was approximately four months (Table 1). One of the patients, a 42-year-old male ophthalmologist, was examined due to the blonde discoloration of hairs of the dorsal hands and distal forearms (Figure 1). The color of the hand and forearms hair had changed to blonde. However, the underlying skin was unaffected. A dermoscopy examination showed lighter hair compared with the natural black hair of unaffected parts. In addition, the hair color of the scalp, upper arms, and other body parts was normal. The patient had frequently used a hand sanitizer that contained 70% ethanol and didecyl dimethyl ammonium chloride (DDAC) for the past five months. The three other patients also had blonde discoloration observable on the hair of dorsal hands. They all reported excessive use of various alcoholic sanitizers. However, they were unaware of other ingredients. In addition, the examination of hair shafts and underlying skin was normal. The COVID-19 pandemic caused an abrupt increase in the use of sanitizers. Hand disinfectants consist of two main categories: non-alcohol-based hand sanitizers and alcohol-based hand sanitizers. The alcohol-based type is an effective measure for the inactivation of enveloped viruses such as coronaviruses (1). It has been shown that percutaneous absorption of alcohol is possible through intact skin. The use of ethanol as a penetration enhancer for pharmaceutical purposes also confirms that ethanol can be absorbed via the skin and be systematically distributed in the body (2). Reisfield et al. observed that intensive use of ethanol-based sanitizers led to an increase in urinary ethanol biomarkers concentrations (3). Alcohols used in various types of gels and solutions are easily released during hand rubbing (4). Ethanol absorption by inhalation should therefore also be taken into account (5). Different pathways of ethanol metabolism can produce free radicals, which affect the antioxidant system (6). In addition, DDAC is also associated with cell growth inhibition and stress oxidative induction (7). Hair discoloration may be a voluntary cosmetic change or a result of chemical or metal exposure. Most unwanted hair discolorations are blonde or white (8). Previous data suggested that an increase in pro-oxidants and a decrease in antioxidants play an important role in hair discoloration. A study performed by Akin Belli et al. demonstrated that hair discoloration is closely related to factors such as emotional stress and alcohol consumption, which cause oxidative stress (9). Hair discoloration might therefore result from oxidative stress induced by ethanol and DDAC used in sanitizers. Golden hair discoloration has been associated with chloride in water. Hypochlorous acid in swimming pool water can penetrate the hair cortex through the cuticle, where it can oxidize and degenerate melanosomes (10). Another possible hypothesis is that the chloride compound in DDAC might be the culprit in sanitizer hair discoloration. Additionally, the bleaching compounds used in some hand disinfectants could be another possible cause of hair discoloration. To the best of our knowledge, this observation of hair discoloration was not previously reported during the COVID-19 outbreak. It is also noteworthy that most hair discoloration normalizes over time (8). The limitations of our study included the fact that the hand sanitizers used by the patients were unavailable and thus their ingredients could not be examined. Furthermore, as most of the sanitizers in this current pandemic are not standardized, they may have unknown ingredients with discoloration properties. Due to the overzealous use of various antiseptics during the pandemic, it is expected that this side-effect will be observed more and more often. Therefore, physicians must be aware of this presentation and reassure the patient regarding this phenomenon. Additionally, products free of such agents should be prescribed to avoid hair discoloration.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales , COVID-19 , Enfermedades del Cabello , Desinfectantes para las Manos , Adulto , Cloruro de Amonio , Antioxidantes , Cloruros , Etanol/efectos adversos , Femenino , Geles , Cabello , Desinfectantes para las Manos/efectos adversos , Desinfectantes para las Manos/química , Humanos , Ácido Hipocloroso , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , Compuestos de Amonio Cuaternario , Agua
7.
Int Ophthalmol ; 42(7): 2127-2132, 2022 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1616190

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the etiological cause distribution in chemical eye injuries during COVID-19 pandemic. METHODS: In this retrospective case series, the medical records of patients, who presented with chemical eye injuries between March 30, 2020, and March 1, 2021, were evaluated and compared with the data covering 10 years before the pandemic. RESULTS: Twenty-seven eyes of twenty-three patients (19 adults, 4 children) who presented in pandemic period were included. Alcohol-based hand sanitizer was one of the two most common agents (n = 6 eyes) in the pandemic era. In the last 10 years before the pandemic, 137 eyes of 102 patients were treated for chemical eye injuries. Injuries due to alcohol-based hand sanitizer increased from 3.1 to 21.1% among all patients, and from 0 to 75% among pediatric patients during the pandemic era compared to the pre-pandemic period. The increase was statistically significant both in all patients (p = .003) and in the pediatric patient group (p = .048). CONCLUSION: Due to COVID-19 pandemic, alcohol-based hand sanitizer use became more common. Consequently, the frequency of hand sanitizer related chemical injuries showed a 13-fold increase and the age group affected by such accidents is altered during the pandemic. Three out of four pediatric patients (75%) were injured with alcohol-based hand sanitizers, which draws attention to the fact that improperly placed hand sanitizer stations, being just at the eye level of children, can cause chemical eye injuries in the pediatric population even more.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Endoftalmitis , Lesiones Oculares , Desinfectantes para las Manos , Adulto , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Demografía , Etanol , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Lesiones Oculares/etiología , Desinfectantes para las Manos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Pandemias , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
J Trop Pediatr ; 67(1)2021 01 29.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1096573

RESUMEN

Palmar erythema in children can be due to various reasons, such as chronic liver disease, rheumatological disorders, medications, irritant contact dermatitis and atopic dermatitis. Recently, there are few reports about contact dermatitis caused by frequent, daily use of hand sanitizers during this COVID-19 pandemic. A 3-year-old toddler brought with the concern of waxing-waning bilateral palmar erythema for the past 2 weeks. The parents revealed that the child liked the bright color of a recently bought hand sanitizer bottle so much he used to wash his hands every 20-30 min throughout the day. The atypical presentation of contact dermatitis might be because the child was using the sanitizer more frequently during the daytime. The dermatitis resolved with stopping excessive use of the hand sanitizer by the toddler. Clinicians should be aware of contact dermatitis during these pandemic times. Instead of investigating them extensively, careful history taking and merely advising them to judicially utilize the sanitizer can lead to complete reversal of symptoms.


Asunto(s)
Antiinfecciosos Locales/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Desinfectantes para las Manos/efectos adversos , COVID-19 , Preescolar , Humanos , Masculino , SARS-CoV-2
11.
Ann Dermatol Venereol ; 148(2): 106-111, 2021 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1095828

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Children with psoriasis may have been directly impacted by the COVID-19 pandemic and their illness may also have affected their ability to follow preventive measures. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children with psoriasis. METHODS: A survey of children (<18 years) with psoriasis, conducted from June 10 to June 29, 2020. RESULTS: In total, 92 children were included: 71.7% had psoriasis lesions at the time of home lockdown while 45.2% were receiving systemic treatments, and two contracted COVID-19. During lockdown, psoriasis worsened in 47.3% of the children and 18.8% stopped their systemic treatments, mainly for reasons linked to the pandemic. A total of 41.3% had a consultation for psoriasis during lockdown (71.1% by teleconsultation): 39.5% due to worsening of their psoriasis and 21.1% for pandemic-related issues. Among patients not having a consultation during lockdown, 27.5% had a cancellation by the doctor and 9.3% had concerns over going to see the doctor. Finally, 22.8% of patients reported finding it difficult to respect hygiene measures because of their psoriasis, e.g., application of alcohol-based hand sanitizers (47.6%), handwashing routines (42.9%), and wearing a mask (28.6%). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates the major clinical impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on children with psoriasis. Teleconsultations played a key role in patient management as regards patient monitoring, provision of information, and renewal of treatments. It is vital that we learn from these data to improve and adapt the monitoring of chronic dermatoses in both children and adults in the event of a future health crisis.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/epidemiología , Pandemias , Psoriasis/epidemiología , Adolescente , Niño , Control de Enfermedades Transmisibles , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Guantes Protectores/efectos adversos , Desinfectantes para las Manos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Masculino , Máscaras/efectos adversos , Consulta Remota/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
13.
JAMA Ophthalmol ; 139(3): 348-351, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-1039145

RESUMEN

Importance: The coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic has made alcohol-based hand sanitizers (ABHS) widely available in public places. This may warrant determining whether cases of unintentional ocular exposure are increasing, especially in children. Objective: To describe the epidemiologic trend of pediatric eye exposures to ABHS and to report the severity of the ocular lesions. Design, Setting, and Participants: Retrospective case series conducted from April 1, 2020, to August 24, 2020. Cases were retrieved from the national database of the French Poison Control Centers (PCC) and from a pediatric ophthalmology referral hospital in Paris, France. Cases of ocular exposure to chemical agents in children younger than 18 years during the study period were reviewed. Cases of ABHS exposure were included. Exposures: The following data were collected: age, sex, circumstances of exposure, symptoms, size of the epithelial defect at first examination, time between the incident and re-epithelialization, and medical and/or surgical management. Main Outcomes and Measures: Comparison of the number of eye exposures to ABHS in children between April to August 2020 and April to August 2019. Results: Between April 1 and August 24, 2020, there were 7 times more pediatric cases of ABHS eye exposures reported in the PCC database compared with the same period in 2019 (9.9% of pediatric eye exposures in 2020 vs 1.3% in 2019; difference, 8.6%; 95% CI, 7.4-9.9; P < .001). The number of cases occurring in public places increased in 2020 (from 16.4% in May to 52.4% in August). Similarly, admissions to the eye hospital for ABHS exposure increased at the same period (16 children in 2020 including 10 boys; mean [SD] age, 3.5 [1.4] years vs 1 boy aged 16 months in 2019). Eight of them presented with a corneal and/or conjunctival ulcer, involving more than 50% of the corneal surface for 6 of them. Two cases required amniotic membrane transplant. Conclusions and Relevance: These data support the likelihood of an increasing number of unintentional ocular exposures to ABHS in the pediatric population. To maintain good public compliance with hand disinfection, these findings support that health authorities should ensure the safe use of these devices and warn the parents and caregivers about their potential danger for children.


Asunto(s)
2-Propanol/efectos adversos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Etanol/efectos adversos , Lesiones Oculares/inducido químicamente , Lesiones Oculares/epidemiología , Desinfección de las Manos , Desinfectantes para las Manos/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , COVID-19/transmisión , Niño , Preescolar , Lesiones Oculares/diagnóstico , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Geles , Humanos , Lactante , Masculino , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Ann Acad Med Singap ; 49(9): 674-676, 2020 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-973006

RESUMEN

Coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic continues to spread globally at a staggering speed. At present, there is no effective treatment or vaccine for COVID-19. Hand disinfection is a cost-effective way to prevent its transmission. According to the Centres for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) guidelines, we should wash our hands with soap and water for at least 20 seconds. If soap and water are not readily available, alcohol-based hand rubs (ABHRs) with at least 60% alcohol are the alternative. With diligent hand disinfection reinforced during COVID-19, there is an increased prevalence of contact dermatitis. This commentary highlights the fact that contact dermatitis is a readily treatable condition and should not cause any deviation of proper hand hygiene. In irritant contact dermatitis (ICD), the management strategies are selection of less irritating hand hygiene products, frequent use of moisturisers to rebuild the skin barrier, and education on proper hand hygiene practices. In allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), the identification and avoidance of the contact allergen is the key to treatment. However, ACD is less common and only accounts for 20% of the cases. The identified allergens in hand cleansers are predominantly preservative excipients and ACD attributable to ABHR are very uncommon. Alcohol-free hand rubs are widely available on the market but it is not a recommended alternative to ABHRs by the CDC.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/terapia , Dermatitis Irritante/terapia , Emolientes/uso terapéutico , Dermatosis de la Mano/terapia , Desinfección de las Manos/métodos , Higroscópicos/uso terapéutico , 1-Propanol/efectos adversos , 2-Propanol/efectos adversos , Antiinfecciosos Locales/efectos adversos , Dermatitis Alérgica por Contacto/etiología , Dermatitis Irritante/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/etiología , Dermatitis Profesional/terapia , Detergentes/efectos adversos , Etanol/efectos adversos , Dermatosis de la Mano/etiología , Higiene de las Manos , Desinfectantes para las Manos/efectos adversos , Personal de Salud , Humanos
16.
Alcohol Alcohol ; 56(1): 42-46, 2021 Jan 04.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-929805

RESUMEN

AIMS: We conducted a cross-sectional survey to estimate the prevalence and clinical manifestation of disulfiram ethanol reaction (DER) and isopropanol toxicity (IT) in patients with alcohol use disorders, on disulfiram. Alcohol-based hand rub contains either ethanol or isopropanol or both. COVID-19 pandemic has led to wide scale usage of sanitizers. Patients with alcohol use disorders, on disulfiram, might experience disulfiram ethanol like reactions with alcohol-based sanitizers. METHODS: We telephonically contacted 339 patients, prescribed disulfiram between January 2014 and March 2020. The assessment pertained to the last 3 months (i.e. third week of March to third week of June 2020). RESULT: The sample consisted of middle-aged men with a mean 16 years of alcohol dependence. Among the 82 (24%) patients adherent to disulfiram, 42 (12.3%) were using alcohol-based hand rubs. Out of these, a total of eight patients (19%; 95% CI 9-33) had features suggestive of DER; four of whom also had features indicative of IT. Five patients (62.5%) had mild and self-limiting symptoms. Severe systemic reactions were experienced by three (37.5%). Severe reactions were observed with exposure to sanitizers in greater amounts, on moist skin or through inhalation. CONCLUSION: Patients on disulfiram should be advised to use alternate methods of hand hygiene.


Asunto(s)
Disuasivos de Alcohol/efectos adversos , Alcoholismo/diagnóstico , Disulfiram/efectos adversos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Etanol/efectos adversos , Desinfectantes para las Manos/efectos adversos , 2-Propanol/administración & dosificación , 2-Propanol/efectos adversos , Adulto , Disuasivos de Alcohol/administración & dosificación , Alcoholismo/tratamiento farmacológico , COVID-19/prevención & control , Estudios Transversales , Disulfiram/administración & dosificación , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Etanol/administración & dosificación , Desinfectantes para las Manos/administración & dosificación , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Centros de Tratamiento de Abuso de Sustancias
18.
Dermatol Ther ; 33(6): e14396, 2020 Nov.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-840549

RESUMEN

Frequency of hand disinfection and adverse skin reactions among health care workers dramatically increased since the COVID-19 outbreak and consensus recommendations on hand hygiene were presented. The aim of the present study was to check the efficacy of the European Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (EADV) Task Force (TF) on Contact Dermatitis (CD) recommendations in a real life and to search if providing products mentioned in that recommendations may increase its efficacy. Doctors and nurses who worked with patients during COVID-19 pandemic and use hand disinfectants received adopted recommendations of the EADV TF on CD only or together with mentioned in that recommendations gel with ethanol and glycerin and emollient. Prevalence of adverse skin reactions on hand disinfectants at baseline was 80.21%. In a month significant improvement of health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and self-assessed improvement of hand skin (P < .01 for both) was reported in "products" group only. Number of participants that had no impact on their HRQoL became higher and the Dermatology Life Quality Index scores lower than in "recommendations only" group (P = .03 and P = .02, respectively). Our results showed that recommendations of the EADV TF on CD may significantly improve HRQoL and hand skin status in health care professionals but provision with products mentioned in that recommendations is crucial.


Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Dermatitis Profesional/prevención & control , Emolientes/administración & dosificación , Glicerol/administración & dosificación , Dermatosis de la Mano/prevención & control , Desinfección de las Manos , Desinfectantes para las Manos/efectos adversos , Control de Infecciones , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Médicos , Administración Cutánea , Adulto , COVID-19/transmisión , Dermatitis Profesional/diagnóstico , Dermatitis Profesional/epidemiología , Femenino , Geles , Dermatosis de la Mano/diagnóstico , Dermatosis de la Mano/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Salud Laboral , Prevalencia , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto Joven
19.
J Emerg Med ; 59(5): 668-672, 2020 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: covidwho-753303

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Households are increasingly stockpiling and producing hand sanitizer amid the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, which can pose an increased risk for unintentional toxicity among children. Despite guidelines for hand sanitizer production published by the World Health Organization, many turn to streaming media for instruction. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this investigation was to evaluate hand sanitizer formulations and safety precautions discussed in popular do-it-yourself (DIY) YouTube videos, and to assess the frequency of calls to poison control centers for pediatric hand sanitizer exposure before and after the arrival of COVID-19 in the United States. METHODS: The first 100 videos on YouTube with the most views using the search term "DIY hand sanitizer" were evaluated for accuracy compared with the World Health Organization local hand sanitizer production guidelines. The incidence of pediatric hand sanitizer exposure reported to participating U.S. poison control centers from January 2018 through May 2020 was reviewed from the American Association of Poison Control Centers National Poison Data System. The average number of calls between January 2020 and May 2020 was compared, and the average number of calls in March 2020 was compared with March 2019 and March 2018. RESULTS: Of the YouTube videos that met inclusion criteria, 27% discussed the use of at least 96% ethanol or 99.8% isopropyl alcohol, 4.1% incorporated 3% hydrogen peroxide, 82% used glycerol or an alternative humectant, and 4.1% specified the need for distilled or previously boiled water. Most of the videos failed to describe labeling storage containers, 69% of videos encouraged the use of oils or perfumes to enhance hand sanitizer scent, and 2% of videos promoted the use of coloring agents to be more attractive for use among children specifically. There was a significantly increased average number of daily calls to poison control centers regarding unsafe pediatric hand sanitizer exposure since the first confirmed COVID-19 patient in the United States. There was a significantly increased average number of daily calls in March 2020 compared with the previous 2 years. CONCLUSIONS: YouTube may not be an accurate source for effective hand sanitizer concoction. Health care providers and parents should be aware of the increased surge in hand sanitizer exposure among children and should take proper precautionary measures.


Asunto(s)
Desinfectantes para las Manos/efectos adversos , Desinfectantes para las Manos/síntesis química , Líneas Directas/tendencias , Centros de Control de Intoxicaciones , Medios de Comunicación Sociales , Grabación en Video , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Salud Infantil , Información de Salud al Consumidor , Líneas Directas/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Pandemias , Estados Unidos/epidemiología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA